In our comparison of Concrete5 vs. M-Files, M-Files is the best option with a higher overall TopAdvisor Score. TopAdvisor Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Add suggested to comparison
Concrete5 vs. M-Files both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management, File Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Data Migration, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Collaboration Tools, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Workflow Automation, Customizable Items, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Adobe, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service, Business Units/Areas Covered. In our feature comparison of Concrete5 vs. M-Files, M-Files offers more of the most popular features and tools than Concrete5.
In our pricing comparison of Concrete5 vs. M-Files, M-Files's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to M-Files's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Concrete5 vs. M-Files shows that M-Files scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin. Concrete5 scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, but M-Files has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
