In our comparison of .LRN vs. Path, Path is the best option with a higher overall TopAdvisor Score. TopAdvisor Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Add suggested to comparison
.LRN vs. Path both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Learning Management, Course Management, Collaboration Tools, Reporting & Analytics, Supported Content Types, Conferencing Capabilities, Language & Speech, Enhancements & Personalization, Customizable Items, Cash Flow Management, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Adobe, Compliance Accreditations, Deployment Options, After-Sales Service, Limits, Business Units/Areas Covered. In our feature comparison of .LRN vs. Path, Path offers more of the most popular features and tools than .LRN.
In our pricing comparison of .LRN vs. Path, Path's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Path's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of .LRN vs. Path shows that Path scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. .LRN scores higher in meets requirements, but Path has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
